Electrooculography
Research Papers
Bereitschaftspotential augmentation by neuro-feedback training in Parkinson's disease
OBJECTIVE: Decreased early Bereitschaftspotential (BP) is one of the electrophysiological characteristics in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). We examined whether PD patients could increase BP amplitude by means of neuro-feedback (NFB) training for their slow cortical potentials (SCPs). METHODS: We worked with 10 PD patients and 11 age-matched controls. BP was measured for self-paced button pressing by their right thumb. The subjects were instructed to make the introspective efforts to produce negative SCPs (negativation). The one-day session consisted of three trials, that is, the first BP, NFB training and the second BP, and each patient performed this routine for 2-4 days. Amplitudes of the first and second BPs were compared between the two groups that were divided depending on NFB performance. RESULTS: Good NFB performance had the tendency of larger early BP in the second BP recording than in the first one, whereas in the poor NFB performance the early BP was smaller in the second BP recording than in the first one in both patient and normal groups (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Good NFB performance of negativation could increase excitatory field potentials of pyramidal cells for the generation of early BP. SIGNIFICANCE: Voluntary regulation of SCPs could enhance BP in PD patients and in aged controls.
View Full Paper →Area-specific self-regulation of slow cortical potentials on the sagittal midline and its effects on behavior
Exteroceptive feedback was given for negative and positive shifts in slow potentials (SPs) recorded from Fz, Cz, or Pz (between groups design). Slow potentials at the feedback site were referred to adjacent scalp and non-cephalic electrodes, so as to confine SP shifts to the feedback location. Area-specific regulation of SPs was obtained at each midsagittal site after 3 days of feedback training. Subjects reported sensorimotor and emotional arousal when negative SP shifts were trained frontally, but not when negative shifts were trained parietally (cognitive/attentional strategies reported after parietal feedback). Area-specific regulation of SPs was subsequently abolished when behavioral tasks were added to further probe frontal/parietal differences (dual-task procedure). These findings indicate that area-specific self-regulation of SPs is possible on the sagittal midline, and that self-regulated parietal SPs (in contrast to frontal ones) arise from non-motoric generators. The source of SP self-regulation was more readily probed by verbal reports of feedback strategy than by study of dual-task relations, because feedback control was disrupted by the dual-task requirement.
View Full Paper →Ready to Optimize Your Brain?
Schedule a free consultation to discuss electrooculography and how neurofeedback training can help
Or call us directly at 855-88-BRAIN
View Programs & Pricing →