ASD
Research Papers
A comparison between classical and new proposed feature selection methods for attention level recognition in disordered children
Lack of attention is a chronic behavior in ADHD (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder) and ASD (Autism Spectrum Disorder). Our goal is to develop a reliable method for the detection of inattention with high accuracy and low time consumption to be used in real time neurofeedback. The new applied methods for inattention in children are EMD (Empirical Mode Decomposition) with difference time series (Dt) and MRA (Multi Resolution Analysis). EMD is a method of breaking down a signal into ‘modes’ (IMFs) representing its different frequency components. Furthermore, MRA strikes balance between temporal and frequency resolution through localizing the EEG signal in frequency domain of interest (beta range) by wavelet decomposition or EMD and then retains time domain information using FD. As the results demonstrate, in intermediate and severe level cases of inattention, EMD_Dt technique is the most accurate. In mild level cases of inattention MRA (wavelet + FD) technique performance is better than EMD_Dt. However, the time consumption of the MRA (wavelet + FD) technique is fifteen times larger than EMD_Dt technique. EMD_Dt is the best technique as it requires less processing time which is the most important factor in neurofeedback, furthermore, clinician concerned more with severe and intermediate level of inattention to be treated.
View Full Paper →Consortium neuroscience of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder: The ENIGMA adventure
Neuroimaging has been extensively used to study brain structure and function in individuals with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) over the past decades. Two of the main shortcomings of the neuroimaging literature of these disorders are the small sample sizes employed and the heterogeneity of methods used. In 2013 and 2014, the ENIGMA-ADHD and ENIGMA-ASD working groups were respectively, founded with a common goal to address these limitations. Here, we provide a narrative review of the thus far completed and still ongoing projects of these working groups. Due to an implicitly hierarchical psychiatric diagnostic classification system, the fields of ADHD and ASD have developed largely in isolation, despite the considerable overlap in the occurrence of the disorders. The collaboration between the ENIGMA-ADHD and -ASD working groups seeks to bring the neuroimaging efforts of the two disorders closer together. The outcomes of case–control studies of subcortical and cortical structures showed that subcortical volumes are similarly affected in ASD and ADHD, albeit with small effect sizes. Cortical analyses identified unique differences in each disorder, but also considerable overlap between the two, specifically in cortical thickness. Ongoing work is examining alternative research questions, such as brain laterality, prediction of case–control status, and anatomical heterogeneity. In brief, great strides have been made toward fulfilling the aims of the ENIGMA collaborations, while new ideas and follow-up analyses continue that include more imaging modalities (diffusion MRI and resting-state functional MRI), collaborations with other large databases, and samples with dual diagnoses.
View Full Paper →Direct modulation of aberrant brain network connectivity through real-time NeuroFeedback
The existence of abnormal connectivity patterns between resting state networks in neuropsychiatric disorders, including Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), has been well established. Traditional treatment methods in ASD are limited, and do not address the aberrant network structure. Using real-time fMRI neurofeedback, we directly trained three brain nodes in participants with ASD, in which the aberrant connectivity has been shown to correlate with symptom severity. Desired network connectivity patterns were reinforced in real-time, without participants' awareness of the training taking place. This training regimen produced large, significant long-term changes in correlations at the network level, and whole brain analysis revealed that the greatest changes were focused on the areas being trained. These changes were not found in the control group. Moreover, changes in ASD resting state connectivity following the training were correlated to changes in behavior, suggesting that neurofeedback can be used to directly alter complex, clinically relevant network connectivity patterns.
View Full Paper →Connectivity-Guided EEG Biofeedback for Autism Spectrum Disorder: Evidence of Neurophysiological Changes
Recent studies have linked neural coherence deficits with impairments associated with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD). The current study tested the hypothesis that lowering neural hyperconnectivity would lead to decreases in autistic symptoms. Subjects underwent connectivity-guided EEG biofeedback, which has been previously found to enhance neuropsychological functioning and to lessen autistic symptoms. Significant reductions in neural coherence across frontotemporal regions and source localized power changes were evident in frontal, temporal, and limbic regions following this treatment. Concurrently, there were significant improvements on objective neuropsychological tests and parents reported positive gains (decreases in symptoms) following the treatment. These findings further validate EEG biofeedback as a therapeutic modality for autistic children and suggest that changes in coherence anomalies may be related to the mechanism of action.
View Full Paper →Ready to Optimize Your Brain?
Schedule a free consultation to discuss asd and how neurofeedback training can help
Or call us directly at 855-88-BRAIN
View Programs & Pricing →